PUDL is a data processing pipeline created by Catalyst Cooperative that cleans, integrates, and standardizes some of the most widely used public energy datasets in the US. The data serve researchers, activists, journalists, and policy makers that might not have the technical expertise to access it in its raw form, the time to clean and prepare the data for bulk analysis, or the means to purchase it from existing commercial providers.
Currently, PUDL has cleaned and integrated data from:
EIA Form 860 (including EIA 860m)
EIA Form 861 (preliminary)
FERC Form 714 (preliminary)
To get started using PUDL data, visit our Data Access page, or continue reading to learn more about the PUDL data processing pipeline.
Raw Data Archives
PUDL depends on “raw” data inputs from sources that are known to occasionally update their data or alter the published format. These changes may be incompatible with the way the data are read and interpreted by PUDL, so, to ensure the integrity of our data processing, we periodically create archives of the raw inputs on Zenodo. Each of the data inputs may have several different versions archived, and all are assigned a unique DOI and made available through the REST API. Each release of the PUDL Python package is embedded with a set of of DOIs to indicate which version of the raw inputs it is meant to process. This process helps ensure that our outputs are replicable.
To enable programmatic access to individual partitions of the data (by year, state, etc.), we archive the raw inputs as Frictionless Data Packages. The data packages contain both the raw data in their originally published format (CSVs, Excel spreadsheets, and Visual FoxPro database (DBF) files) and metadata that describes how each the dataset is partitioned.
The PUDL software will download a copy of the appropriate raw inputs automatically as needed and organize them in a local datastore.
The ETL Process
The core of PUDL’s work takes place in the ETL (Extract, Transform, and Load) process.
The Extract step reads the raw data from the original heterogeneous formats into a
pandas.DataFrame with uniform column names across all years so
that it can be easily processed in bulk. Data distributed as binary database files, such
as the DBF files from FERC Form 1, may be converted into a unified SQLite database
before individual dataframes are created.
Module documentation within the
The Transform step is generally broken down into two phases. Phase one focuses on cleaning and organizing data within individual tables while phase two focuses on the integration and deduplication of data between tables. These tasks can be tedious data wrangling toil that impose a huge amount of overhead on anyone trying to do analysis based on the publicly available data. PUDL implements common data cleaning operations in the hopes that we can all work on more interesting problems most of the time. These operations include:
Standardization of units (e.g. dollars not thousands of dollars)
Standardization of N/A values
Standardization of freeform names and IDs
Use of controlled vocabularies for categorical values like fuel type
Use of more readable codes and column names
Imposition of well defined, rich data types for each column
Converting local timestamps to UTC
Reshaping of data into well normalized tables which minimize data duplication
Inferring Plant IDs which link records across many years of FERC Form 1 data
Inferring linkages between FERC and EIA Plants and Utilities.
Inferring more complete associations between EIA boilers and generators
The module and per-table transform functions in the
sub-package have more details on the specific transformations applied to each
Many of the original datasets contain large amounts of duplicated data. For instance, the EIA reports the name of each power plant in every table that refers to otherwise unique plant-related data. Similarly, many attributes like plant latitude and longitude are reported separately every year. Often, these reported values are not self-consistent. There may be several different spellings of a plant’s name, or an incorrectly reported latitude in one year.
The transform step attempts to eliminate this kind of inconsistent and duplicate information when normalizing the tables by choosing only the most consistently reported value for inclusion in the final database. If a value which should be static is not consistently reported, it may also be set to N/A.
Tidy Data by Hadley Wickham, Journal of Statistical Software (2014).
A Simple Guide to the Five Normal Forms in Relational Database Theory by William Kent, Communications of the ACM (1983).
At the end of the Transform step, we have collections of
correspond to database tables. These are loaded into an SQLite database.
To handle the ~1 billion row :doc:`data_sources/epacems, we load the dataframes into
an Apache Parquet dataset that is partitioned by state and year.
These outputs can be accessed via Python, R, and many other tools. See the PUDL Data Dictionary page for a list of the normalized database tables and their contents.
Module documentation within the
We normalize the data to make storage more efficient and avoid data integrity issues, but you may want to combine information from more than one of the tables to make the data more readable and readily interpretable. For example, PUDL stores the name that EIA uses to refer to a power plant in the plants_entity_eia table in association with the plant’s unique numeric ID. If you are working with data from the fuel_receipts_costs_eia923 table, which records monthly per-plant fuel deliveries, you may want to have the name of the plant alongside the fuel delivery information since it’s more recognizable than the plant ID.
Rather than requiring everyone to write their own SQL
or do a bunch of
pandas.merge() operations to bring together data, PUDL provides a
variety of predefined queries as methods of the
class. These methods perform common joins to return output tables (pandas DataFrames)
that contain all of the useful information in one place. In some cases, like with EIA,
the output tables are composed to closely resemble the raw spreadsheet tables you’re
In the future, we intend to replace the simple denormalized output tables with database views that are integrated into the distributed SQLite database directly. This will provide the same convenience without requiring use of the Python software layer.
There are several analytical routines built into the
pudl.output.pudltabl.PudlTabl output objects for calculating derived values
like the heat rate by generation unit (
hr_by_unit) or the capacity factor by generator
capacity_factor). We intend to
integrate more analytical outputs into the library over time.
We have a growing collection of data validation test cases that we run before
publishing a data release to try and avoid publishing data with known issues. Most of
these validations are described in the
pudl.validate module. They check things
The heat content of various fuel types are within expected bounds.
Coal ash, moisture, mercury, sulfur etc. content are within expected bounds
Generator heat rates and capacity factors are realistic for the type of prime mover being reported.
Some data validations are currently only specified within our test suite, including:
The expected number of records within each table
The fact that there are no entirely N/A columns
A variety of database integrity checks are also run either during the ETL process or when the data is loaded into SQLite.
See our Testing PUDL documentation for more information.